Exclusive Content:

The critical support provided by service providers like accountants

Navigating the Second Year of UAE Corporate Tax:...

Transitioning from Tax Accounting to Management Accounting: A Guide...

Mastering Breakeven Analysis for SME Clients: Insights from...

Study finds that Australia’s financial literacy strategy is inactive

Australia's Financial Literacy Strategy "Not Active" - Research...

The Hickenlooper AI Auditing Bill and the Growing Influence of the Commerce Department in AI Policy

The Hickenlooper AI Auditing Bill and the Growing Influence of the Commerce Department in AI Policy

Proposed Federal AI Legislation and the Role of NIST

AI Auditing Legislation Gains Traction in Congress

Legislation related to artificial intelligence (AI) auditing is gaining momentum in Congress, with several bills proposing different approaches to overseeing AI systems. The Validation and Evaluation for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence Act (VET AI Act), introduced by Sen. John Hickenlooper, focuses on voluntary guidelines for AI auditing, in contrast to other bills that propose more regulatory authority for overseeing AI.

Currently, over 760 AI-related bills are pending in the United States, with a mix of federal and state-level proposals. The VET AI Act stands out for its emphasis on collaboration and voluntary standards, working with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to develop guidelines for AI auditing.

AI auditing and impact assessments are becoming increasingly important tools for evaluating the performance and potential harms of AI systems. While some bills propose mandatory assessments, the VET AI Act takes a more flexible approach, focusing on best practices and certification of third-party evaluators.

The role of the Department of Commerce (DOC) in AI policy is also expanding, with NIST playing a central role in developing AI safety standards. The VET AI Act and other Senate bills envision NIST as a key player in overseeing AI governance, building on existing frameworks like the AI Risk Management Framework.

Recent Supreme Court decisions, such as Loper Bright v. Raimondo and Murthy v. Missouri, could impact the implementation of AI auditing legislation. While the Court’s decisions may influence the regulatory landscape, the focus on voluntary standards and collaborative governance remains a key aspect of the proposed AI legislation.

Overall, the VET AI Act and other AI auditing bills signal a shift towards more collaborative and flexible approaches to AI governance, emphasizing best practices and industry standards over rigid regulatory frameworks. As the debate over AI policy continues, finding the right balance between innovation and oversight will be crucial for the future of AI technology in the United States.

Latest

The critical support provided by service providers like accountants

Navigating the Second Year of UAE Corporate Tax:...

Transitioning from Tax Accounting to Management Accounting: A Guide to Diversifying Your Skillset

Mastering Breakeven Analysis for SME Clients: Insights from...

Study finds that Australia’s financial literacy strategy is inactive

Australia's Financial Literacy Strategy "Not Active" - Research...

Philadelphia’s Tax Policies Safeguard Small Businesses

Analysis of Tax Burdens on Businesses in Philadelphia...

Newsletter

Don't miss

HKA expands forensic accounting and commercial damages practice with three new experts

HKA Welcomes Three Experts to Forensic Accounting and...

Delta Air Lines CEO Challenges the Economic Tactics of Budget Airlines

Delta Air Lines CEO Critiques Low-Cost Carriers Amid...

Chief Financial Officer: Future audits will reflect enhanced internal...

City's Fiscal Year 2021 Audit Findings Addressed by Chief Financial Officer City CFO Addresses Poor Accounting Practices in Recent Audit In a recent audit report...

Enhancing Internal Audit for Enhanced Public Financial Systems

Launch of Independence and Accountability in Governance Report: Strengthening Internal Audit for Improved Public Financial Management Internal Audit Agency Director General Calls for Strengthening...

Walmart fined $1.64M by NJ for pricing practices

Walmart to Pay $1.64 Million Settlement for Unlawful Pricing Practices in New Jersey Walmart to Pay $1.64 Million to Settle Allegations of Unlawful Pricing...