Exclusive Content:

Study finds that Australia’s financial literacy strategy is inactive

Australia's Financial Literacy Strategy "Not Active" - Research...

Philadelphia’s Tax Policies Safeguard Small Businesses

Analysis of Tax Burdens on Businesses in Philadelphia...

Minister Declares Ottawa Will Not Intervene as Former Chief...

Federal Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations Declines to Govern...

Conflicting Priorities: Balancing Data Privacy Laws and Tax Audit Compliance

Conflicting Priorities: Balancing Data Privacy Laws and Tax Audit Compliance

State Efforts to Obtain Customer Identifying Information in Digital Goods Audits: Balancing Tax Compliance and Data Privacy

State efforts to obtain customer identifying information for digital goods audits have raised concerns about data privacy. Tax authorities are requesting sensitive information such as names, addresses, and even Social Security numbers to determine how to source digital transactions. The Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board is taking steps to amend its agreement to simplify sales tax codes, addressing issues with assigning local tax rates when complete customer information is not collected.

The lack of a national data privacy law in the US has left many companies unsure of how to navigate these requests. While states like California have robust data privacy laws, the exemption for compliance with tax laws is not always clear. Telecommunications companies have long been subject to providing customer information for compliance with the law, but the intersection of tax compliance and data privacy laws is becoming increasingly complex.

The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) sets strict guidelines for the transfer of personal data, even outside of EU member states. However, the US has successfully argued that its interest in tax compliance outweighs privacy concerns, as seen in the case of United States of America v. Eaton Corp. The court ruled in favor of the IRS, allowing the transfer and disclosure of data for tax purposes.

Companies can take protective measures to ensure compliance with data privacy laws, such as providing customer account numbers instead of names and addresses, or requesting administrative summons for personally identifying information. The gray area between tax compliance and data privacy laws is evolving, but companies can protect themselves by reviewing audit practices and implementing internal processes.

As the landscape of data privacy and tax compliance continues to shift, companies must stay vigilant in protecting customer information while meeting their tax obligations.

Latest

Study finds that Australia’s financial literacy strategy is inactive

Australia's Financial Literacy Strategy "Not Active" - Research...

Philadelphia’s Tax Policies Safeguard Small Businesses

Analysis of Tax Burdens on Businesses in Philadelphia...

Minister Declares Ottawa Will Not Intervene as Former Chief Sues Assembly of First Nations

Federal Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations Declines to Govern...

Marlow Accounting Offers Comprehensive Accounting Solutions in Billings

Benefits of Choosing Marlow Accounting for Your Financial...

Newsletter

Don't miss

HKA expands forensic accounting and commercial damages practice with three new experts

HKA Welcomes Three Experts to Forensic Accounting and...

Delta Air Lines CEO Challenges the Economic Tactics of Budget Airlines

Delta Air Lines CEO Critiques Low-Cost Carriers Amid...

Chief Financial Officer: Future audits will reflect enhanced internal...

City's Fiscal Year 2021 Audit Findings Addressed by Chief Financial Officer City CFO Addresses Poor Accounting Practices in Recent Audit In a recent audit report...

Enhancing Internal Audit for Enhanced Public Financial Systems

Launch of Independence and Accountability in Governance Report: Strengthening Internal Audit for Improved Public Financial Management Internal Audit Agency Director General Calls for Strengthening...

Walmart fined $1.64M by NJ for pricing practices

Walmart to Pay $1.64 Million Settlement for Unlawful Pricing Practices in New Jersey Walmart to Pay $1.64 Million to Settle Allegations of Unlawful Pricing...